How Can Filioque Be False?

Originally posted 9/4/2010.

How can the Filioque clause be heretical when all the Latin Fathers from St. Hilary onward{1}–with whom the Greek Fathers were in communion over the centuries and with whose consensus the Greek Fathers cannot, as a whole, disagree on a matter of divine and Catholic faith–taught that the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds, qua hypostasis, from the Father and the Son?{2}

Notes & References
{1} Gill, Fr. Joseph, and B. L. Marthaler “Filioque.” New Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 5, 2nd ed. Detroit: Gale, 2003. p. 720. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Gale. Fordham University Libraries. 4 Sept. 2010.
{2} For fairly detailed proof that the Latin Fathers unanimously teach a hypostatic, not merely energetic, procession from the Father and the Son, see Huysman, Will R. “Filioque.” Catholic Patristics. 7 Oct. 2010. 10 Jan. 2011 <http://catholicpatristics.blogspot.com/2010/10/filioque.html>.

Advertisements

One Response to How Can Filioque Be False?

  1. […] Mammas Refutes Mark of Ephesus on FIlioque *The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son *How Can Filioque Be False? *The Meaning of Filioque *The Meaning of the Monarchy of the Father *Response to Ian on Filioque […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: